His remarks have reignited debate about the culture of money and patronage that dominated the 11th Parliament under the leadership of Speaker Anita Annet Among and Deputy Speaker Tayebwa. Critics and governance observers have long argued that excessive monetization of politics contributed to weakening institutional independence and accountability within Parliament.During the 11th Parliament, there were persistent claims and public discussions alleging that MPs frequently received cash handouts from the Speaker’s office. Some legislators and political commentators alleged that weekly distributions of money became normalized, although the exact source of the funds was often unclear and not publicly explained. Supporters of the parliamentary leadership, however, defended the practice as welfare support intended to help MPs facing financial and constituency pressures.The issue of financial dependence among legislators has remained central to discussions about corruption in Uganda’s political system. Analysts argue that the high cost of elections, pressure from constituents for direct financial assistance, and the absence of strong institutional safeguards have created conditions that encourage transactional politics.

Heavily indebted

Observers note that many MPs enter Parliament heavily indebted after expensive campaigns, making them vulnerable to influence from powerful political actors. Once elected, lawmakers are often expected to fund funerals, school fees, medical bills, and community events in their constituencies. This pressure, critics say, fuels a cycle where MPs continuously seek financial support from wealthier political offices or individuals.Anti-corruption activists have also pointed to weak transparency mechanisms and limited public disclosure regarding parliamentary expenditures as factors that deepen suspicion and erode public trust. Allegations of cash distributions in Parliament have periodically sparked public outrage, especially at a time when many Ugandans continue to struggle with rising living costs and unemployment.

Tayebwa’s comments therefore offer a rare glimpse into the internal financial culture of Uganda’s legislature. While his warning focused on personal responsibility among MPs, it has also drawn attention to broader systemic concerns about the relationship between money, political loyalty, and governance in Parliament.Political analysts say meaningful reforms would require stricter accountability measures, stronger enforcement of ethical standards, and broader electoral reforms aimed at reducing the financial burden associated with political office.As public scrutiny of Parliament continues, Tayebwa’s remarks may further intensify calls for greater transparency and institutional reforms within Uganda’s legislative arm.

Investigators are reportedly interested in large sums of money that allegedly passed through Mwanje’s personal bank accounts during the execution of the projects.“CID detectives want clear explanations about the movement of billions of shillings and the purpose for which the funds were transferred,” a source close to the investigations said. “They are trying to establish whether the transactions were legitimate project payments or part of a broader financial scheme.”Friends and close associates of Mwanje say the engineer has been under immense pressure since receiving the summons earlier this week.“He has been extremely disturbed and anxious,” one longtime friend, who requested anonymity due to the sensitivity of the matter, revealed. “Joseph has been saying goodbye to people close to him because he fears the situation could worsen. He believes he is being dragged into a political storm much bigger than him.”Another associate described Mwanje as a “professional engineer caught in complicated political crossfire.”“As chief engineer, he handled payments to contractors and site workers. He was responsible for procurement of construction materials like cement, steel, bricks, sand, and other supplies,” the associate said. “But whether he knew the source or implications of all the money is something only investigations can establish.”

Mwanje, who previously served as a manager at Uganda Cranes, is also known in sports circles as the proprietor of Lugazi FC a football club based in Buikwe District.Investigators are reportedly scrutinizing several luxury properties and construction projects believed to have been managed under Mwanje’s supervision over the last few years.The CID summonses also extend to other individuals considered influential within Among’s inner circle. Sources identified some of those expected for interrogation as parliamentary logistics and transport officials as well as media aides, including Joseph Sabiiti.According to insiders, investigators are particularly interested in understanding how parliamentary connections may have been used in facilitating financial transactions, procurement arrangements, and movement of funds.One parliamentary source familiar with the developments said the atmosphere among Among’s associates has become tense and uncertain.“Many people are panicking because they don’t know how far these investigations will go,” the source explained. “Some fear they may be arrested, while others believe they are only being treated as witnesses.”

The widening probe comes amid growing public scrutiny over the wealth, spending, and financial dealings of several high-ranking public officials.Although authorities have remained tight-lipped about the exact offences under investigation, sources indicate that detectives are examining possible cases involving abuse of office, money laundering, illicit enrichment, and conspiracy to commit financial crimes.CID officials declined to comment directly on the identities of those summoned but confirmed that “ongoing investigations involving public officials and their associates” were underway.Political analysts say the latest developments could mark a significant turning point in Uganda’s anti-corruption landscape if investigations are pursued independently and transparently.“This is one of the first times investigators appear willing to question not only politicians but also the operational networks around them,” political commentator Samuel Bwanika said. “The people who manage projects, logistics, and finances often hold critical information.”

However, some supporters of Among have dismissed the investigations as politically motivated.A close confidant of the former Speaker defended her associates, insisting they were merely carrying out professional duties.“People are trying to criminalize ordinary work relationships,” the confidant argued. “Engineers, assistants, and logistics officers were simply doing their jobs. It is unfair to portray everyone around Anita Among as part of wrongdoing before investigations are complete.”By press time, several of the summoned individuals were reportedly preparing to appear before CID detectives accompanied by lawyers.The outcome of the interrogations is expected to shape the next phase of investigations and could potentially lead to further summonses, arrests, or asset-related inquiries in the coming days.

The President accused Mwenda and like-minded PLU activists of deliberately undermining Uganda’s industrial transformation agenda while pretending to champion economic efficiency.“You are supposed to be a journalist. Why do you not interview these so-called conmen such as Magoola, Senfuka and others? Visit their factories and projects before spreading lies,” Museveni charged.The President specifically defended Uganda’s local manufacturing and value-addition drive, including Kiira Motors, gold refining, coffee processing, dairy production and agro-industrialization projects that he said critics like Mwenda consistently sabotage.“You are ashamed to talk about Kiira Motors because it is a shame to neo-colonial agents like Mwenda,” Museveni said.

Hits PLU

He accused the PLU ideologue of promoting foreign interests aimed at keeping Africa dependent on exporting raw materials instead of finished products.“The do-nothingers like Andrew Mwenda always run around noisily telling lies while defending the neo-colonial status quo,” Museveni added.The President cited Uganda’s growing economy, gold exports, coffee boom and dairy expansion as evidence that his policies are working despite criticism from what he described as “traitors and foreign agents.”Museveni also questioned Mwenda’s motives for allegedly leaking internal government and Cabinet discussions onto social media platforms.

“What could be the real motive of Andrew Mwenda externalizing our internal discussions? It is to scare away our partners because people like Mwenda are worried by Uganda’s economic success now growing at 6.3 percent annually,” Museveni said.The President further accused Mwenda of historically sabotaging Uganda’s electricity sector by opposing the AES Bujagali power project in the early 2000s.“This is not the first time Mwenda has sabotaged Uganda’s progress,” Museveni argued.

Ofwono Opondo Warns PLU Activists

Meanwhile, senior NRM cadre and government spokesperson Ofwono Opondo has reportedly warned PLU activists and supporters against engaging in what he called “reckless political arrogance” and attacks on President Museveni.Opondo has cautioned that attempts by elements within PLU to portray Museveni as weak or senile could destabilize both the ruling National Resistance Movement (NRM) and the country.“Those attacking the President under the cover of social media excitement should know that politics is not abuse. You cannot build leadership by insulting the historical leadership that stabilized Uganda,” Opondo reportedly warned.The remarks come amid growing political tension within pro-government circles, with observers increasingly questioning whether Gen. Muhoozi Kainerugaba’s PLU movement is gradually transforming from a pressure group into a parallel political power center positioning itself for succession battles inside the ruling establishment.

Political analysts say the latest public fallout between Museveni loyalists and prominent PLU figures exposes widening cracks within Uganda’s power structure ahead of the 2026 elections.Despite the criticism, Museveni remained defiant, invoking his liberation war background and insisting that Uganda’s transformation mission would continue regardless of opposition from critics within or outside government.

“As a freedom fighter, I am always stubbornly standing for patriotism, Pan-Africanism, socio-economic transformation and democracy. I am never swayed by traitors and foreign agents,” Museveni declared. He concluded with his trademark revolutionary slogan: “Aluta Continua. Victory is Certain.”

Money, Music & Mobilisation

Political observers say Balaam’s rise comes at a delicate time for the ruling party, especially as internal succession debates continue to quietly shape alliances ahead of future political contests. Some insiders believe his growing popularity among grassroots mobilisers could eventually place him at the center of major power calculations within the NRM.Critics inside the party privately accuse Balaam of using his wealth to build an independent political machine capable of rivaling long-established structures. His supporters, however, dismiss such criticism as jealousy from political elites uncomfortable with a newcomer commanding large crowds and enjoying direct access to influential leaders. “Balaam understands mobilisation better than many traditional politicians,” said one political analyst in NRM party. “He knows entertainment, social media, youth culture and grassroots networks. That combination is powerful in modern Ugandan politics.”

The Celebrity Connection

Indeed, Balaam’s close relationship with Uganda’s entertainment industry has become one of his strongest political weapons. Over the years, he has financially supported several musicians, comedians and performers, many of whom command massive followings among urban youth. The list among others includes Jose Chameleon, Juliana Kanyomozi, the entire former Eagles Production band crew of Mesarch Ssemakula and Godfrey Lutaaya.  His influence within the entertainment scene has helped him maintain visibility far beyond traditional political spaces. Several musicians openly praise him for supporting concerts, welfare projects and industry initiatives at times when other politicians ignored the creative sector. Such loyalty could eventually translate into political capital, especially among younger voters increasingly driven by celebrity influence and online mobilisation. His connections are not limited to entertainment circles alone.

 Kingdom Allies Raise Eyebrows

Political insiders also point to Balaam’s growing closeness with cultural institutions, especially within Bunyoro and Busoga, as a major factor behind his expanding influence. His appearances at kingdom functions and his cordial relationship with prominent cultural figures have fueled speculation that he is quietly building alliances capable of stretching far beyond ordinary party politics. Analysts say support from influential cultural networks could significantly strengthen his standing in regions considered politically strategic for the NRM. At the same time, Balaam’s confidence has continued to attract public attention. In a recent media interaction, the businessman reportedly declared that he is already financially successful and does not depend on State House favors for survival. The remarks immediately triggered debate across political circles, with some interpreting them as a sign of increasing political independence. “He wants to project himself as a self-made billionaire who cannot easily be controlled,” one Kampala-based commentator noted.

That image has only added to growing speculation about his long-term ambitions within the ruling movement. Behind closed doors, some party insiders reportedly worry that Balaam’s expanding grassroots machinery could complicate existing succession calculations inside the NRM. Others insist such fears are exaggerated and argue that Balaam remains loyal to the party leadership and merely wants to strengthen mobilisation efforts.Still, his critics claim his style of politics — driven by money, celebrity networks and youth mobilisation — represents a new and unpredictable force within the ruling party.

The Global Network

The businessman’s international connections have also attracted attention. Associates say Balaam maintains strong business and social networks in Europe and the United States, connections developed over many years through entertainment promotion, diaspora engagement and private business interests. Supporters argue these global contacts give him influence and exposure that many local politicians lack. Some analysts believe such networks could eventually help him shape international perceptions and strengthen his political brand both locally and abroad.

Tension in NRM

Meanwhile, tensions within sections of the NRM continue to intensify as different camps position themselves ahead of future political battles. The troubles surrounding embattled Speaker Anita Among have further complicated internal dynamics, creating uncertainty over alliances and loyalties inside the party.In this increasingly fragile environment, Balaam’s growing popularity has become impossible to ignore. At public rallies, supporters chant his name with excitement. On social media, his followers portray him as a youthful, energetic mobiliser capable of connecting with ordinary Ugandans in ways many traditional politicians cannot. Videos of him distributing aid, supporting musicians and interacting with crowds frequently circulate online, strengthening his image as a man of the people. But not everyone is impressed.

Opponents accuse him of promoting personality politics fueled by money and spectacle rather than ideology or policy. Others fear the growing culture of financially-driven mobilisation could deepen divisions within the ruling movement. Yet despite the criticism, Balaam continues to expand his footprint.Whether attending kingdom events, appearing alongside musicians or presiding over massive political gatherings, the businessman has mastered the art of remaining visible in Uganda’s fast-changing political landscape. For now, one thing appears certain: Balaam Barugahara is no longer just an events promoter. He has become a political force attracting admiration, controversy and anxiety in equal measure.And as power struggles quietly intensify within the NRM, many will be watching closely to see whether his rise is merely a temporary political moment — or the beginning of something much bigger.

 Balaam The Mr. Moneybags 

Political observers have also started speculating about whether Balaam’s growing financial influence and international business connections could one day attract scrutiny from Western governments, particularly at a time when several Ugandan political figures have faced sanctions and travel restrictions over governance and corruption concerns. Although there is no public indication that Balaam is under investigation or targeted for sanctions, some analysts argue that his rising political profile, flamboyant spending and expanding influence within ruling party structures could eventually place him under increased international attention.Supporters dismiss such claims as politically motivated rumors spread by rivals uncomfortable with his rapid rise. They insist Balaam’s wealth comes from legitimate business interests developed over many years in entertainment promotion, hospitality and private investments. Nonetheless, in Uganda’s highly charged political environment, even speculation about possible sanctions has become enough to trigger intense debate within elite political circles.

Few works capture this paradox more powerfully than “Good to Great”, where Jim Collins introduces the concept of Level 5 Leadership, a rare blend of personal humility and professional will. Collins observes that the most effective leaders are those who are “ambitious first and foremost for the cause, the organisation, and its purpose, not themselves.” This combination of humility and focus creates leaders who are both grounded and driven, capable of building enduring greatness rather than fleeting success.Humility fosters trust, and trust is the foundation of all high-performing teams. In “Leaders Eat Last”, Simon Sinek notes that great leaders prioritise the well-being of their people, creating environments where individuals feel safe to contribute and innovate. “Leadership is not about being in charge,” Sinek Simon alluded, “it is about taking care of those in your charge.” Such care is impossible without humility, the willingness to put others before ego.

In contrast, command-and-control leadership often stifles initiative and discourages dissent. In stable environments, this model may produce short-term efficiency. But in uncertain contexts, it becomes a liability. When leaders assume they have all the answers, organisations lose the very diversity of thought required to navigate complexity. Humble leaders, by contrast, create space for dialogue. They understand that insight is distributed, not centralised.The psychological dimension of humility is equally significant. Research consistently shows that leaders who demonstrate humility are more approachable, more open to feedback, and more effective at learning. In “Dare to Lead”, Brené Brown argues that vulnerability, closely linked to humility, is not a weakness but a source of courage. “Vulnerability is the birthplace of innovation, creativity and change,” she writes. For new leaders, this reframes the role of leadership from projecting perfection to embracing authenticity.Yet humility alone is not sufficient. The future does not belong to passive leaders, but to those who combine humility with focus, a disciplined commitment to purpose and results. This balance is what distinguishes effective leadership from mere likability. Humble but unfocused leaders may inspire goodwill, but they risk drifting without direction. Focus provides the strategic clarity that channels humility into impact.

A powerful illustration of this balance can be found in “The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People” by Stephen R. Covey, where the principle of “seeking first to understand, then to be understood” underscores the role of humility in effective communication. At the same time, Covey emphasises the importance of beginning with the end in mind, a reminder that clarity of vision must accompany openness of mind.Humble leaders are also better equipped to build resilient organisations. By acknowledging uncertainty and encouraging collective problem-solving, they create cultures that are adaptable rather than fragile. Employees in such environments are more engaged because they feel valued, and more innovative because they feel safe. In this sense, humility becomes a multiplier, it amplifies the intelligence and capability of the entire organisation.Moreover, humility enhances decision-making. Leaders who are willing to admit what they do not know are more likely to seek diverse inputs, challenge assumptions, and avoid costly errors. As Peter Druckerwisely noted, “The greatest danger in times of turbulence is not the turbulence, it is to act with yesterday’s logic.” Humility protects leaders from this danger by keeping them intellectually flexible and open to change.

For emerging leaders, the implications are profound. First, cultivate self-awareness. Understand your strengths, but also your blind spots. Second, listen deeply. Influence is not built through speaking more, but through understanding better. Third, remain anchored in purpose. Let humility guide your interactions, but let focus guide your direction.Ultimately, the question is not whether humility has a place in leadership, but whether leadership without humility can endure. In a world where knowledge is expanding, change is accelerating, and expectations are evolving, no single leader can possess all the answers. The leaders who will thrive are those who recognise this reality, and lead accordingly.

In a nutshell, the future belongs to the humble but focused. Not because humility diminishes authority, but because it redefines it. True authority is no longer about dominance; it is about credibility. It is not about being the smartest person in the room, but about creating a room where everyone can be smart together. In the final analysis, humility is not just a moral virtue, it is a strategic necessity. And for those willing to embrace it, it may well be the quiet force that shapes the next era of leadership excellence.

The writer is the General Manager Commercial Banking at Centenary Bank

The partnership is the direct result of a high-level benchmark visit undertaken in April 2026, when the Governance and Executive Leadership of Centenary Group and its subsidiary companies travelled to Huawei’s global headquarters in Shenzhen. The delegation met with Huawei’s Global Digital Finance leadership, toured technology innovation centres and saw firsthand the systems reshaping banking in markets across Asia, Africa, and beyond. The eight priorities underpinning the MoU were identified and agreed during that visit; making this a partnership shaped by direct experience, not assembled at a desk.The MoU defines eight areas of cooperation. At its core are three strategic priorities: building intelligent, AI-driven banking systems; securing the Group’s technology infrastructure against evolving cyber threats; and modernising Centenary’s data centre and application stack to support growth at scale. The remaining pillars cover human capital development, co-innovation, and joint research; ensuring the partnership creates lasting capability inside Centenary, not just technology dependency on the outside. Together, they map a staged progression from foundational digitisation through to full digital transformation, with Huawei as the Group’s technology partner at each milestone. In Centenary Group’s ambition, this is the Bank 5.0 journey — a model of banking in which artificial intelligence, cloud infrastructure and real-time data intelligence are embedded into every layer of how a bank operates, not layered on top of legacy systems

Centenary Bank, the Group’s flagship banking subsidiary serves over four million customers, the majority of whom live and work in rural and peri-urban communities across Uganda. For these customers, this partnership carries direct, tangible significance. Modern digital platforms, smarter branch networks, and AI-powered services will mean faster access to credit, more responsive support, and financial products designed around their lives. For the smallholder farmer, the market trader, and the micro-entrepreneur, this partnership is a commitment to serve them better, wherever they are.

Significance for Uganda and Key Stakeholders

The MoU is directly aligned with Uganda’s National Development Plan IV and the Digital Transformation Roadmap, which together chart the country’s course toward a digitally enabled economy  and with the National Financial Inclusion Strategy, which places accessible digital financial services at the heart of that agenda.Centenary Group’s Tier 3 Data Centre in Masaka anchors a growing digital infrastructure footprint that positions Uganda to attract further investment in the digital economy, develop high-value technology skills and strengthen its standing as a regional technology hub.For the Group’s shareholders, development partners, and community stakeholders, this MoU is a decisive commitment to long-term relevance and resilience grounded, as always, in Centenary Group’s founding mission to provide financial services to the rural and less privileged in a sustainable, values-driven manner.

Prof. John Ddumba-Ssentamu, Executive Chairman, Centenary Rural Development Group Limited said partnerships have always been at the heart of how Centenary Group has grown and this is the most significant we have signed in a generation. He noted that Huawei brings global depth and Centenary brings local mission and deep community trust.“Together, we are building something that will matter to millions of Africans who deserve the kind of digital & financial inclusion this partnership will make possible. What we witnessed in Shanghai confirmed something we already knew: AI cannot be treated as software you install and walk away from. It has to become the way an institution thinks and operates. That is the transformation Centenary Group is now committed to building,” he said.Mr. Fabian Kasi, Managing Director, Centenary Bank said banking in Uganda is changing faster than at any point in the bank’s forty-year history. He noted that customers expect more faster credit decisions, smarter services, and a bank that anticipates their needs rather than waiting for them to walk through the door. “This partnership gives Centenary Bank the technology foundation to deliver exactly that. For our four million customers and the next eight million, this is a defining moment,” he said.

Meanwhile Dr. Grace Ssekakubo, Chief Executive Officer, Centenary Technology Services Limited said Centenary Technology Services exists to make the Group’s technology ambitions a reality, and this MoU gives them direct access to Huawei’s global expertise in AI, data governance and enterprise modernisation at precisely the moment when the company is building the shared services backbone that will serve the entire Group for decades.Mr. Zhang Hao, Country Managing Director, Huawei Uganda said Africa’s financial services sector is among the most dynamic in the world and Uganda is at its leading edge. “Centenary Group’s four-decade commitment to reaching customers that formal banking has historically underserved is a mission that Huawei deeply admires and wants to amplify. We bring experience across more than 5,600 financial institutions in 80 countries and we intend to put every lesson we have learned to work here,” Hao noted.

 About Centenary Rural Development Group Limited

Centenary Rural Development Group Limited is Uganda’s leading financial services holding group, providing strategic oversight and investment to its subsidiaries in banking, technology, insurance, and community services. Its flagship subsidiary, Centenary Bank, is Uganda’s largest microfinance-oriented commercial bank, serving over four million customers nationwide. Centenary Technology Services Limited drives the Group’s digital and technology agenda. Founded in 1983 and guided by Christian values, Centenary Group’s mission is to provide relevant financial services, especially to the rural and less privileged, in a sustainable manner.

 About Huawei Technologies (Uganda) Company Limited

Huawei Technologies (Uganda) Company Limited is a subsidiary of Huawei Investment & Holding Co., Ltd., a leading global provider of ICT infrastructure and smart devices. Huawei serves as an integrated ICT partner in Uganda, driving digital transformation across public and private sectors. Globally, Huawei’s Digital Finance Business Unit has served over 5,600 financial institutions in more than 80 countries, including 53 of the world’s top 100 banks, and has partnered with over 150 global solution providers.

The plan, anchored on the theme “Water for All for Health and Prosperity,” aligns with Uganda’s Vision 2040 and the Fourth National Development Plan, and comes on the back of steady growth recorded over the past five years.Between 2020 and 2025, NWSC expanded its service coverage from 258 to 287 towns, while its customer base grew from 724,000 to over one million. The population served rose from 15 million to 20 million people, with annual turnover increasing from UGX 385 billion to UGX 649 billion. Customer satisfaction has remained stable at about 80 percent.Building on this growth, the corporation now targets to increase the population served to 26 million people by 2030. The plan also includes expansion of pipeline networks by at least 500 kilometres and delivery of about 60,000 new connections annually.

The upcoming event, dubbed The Coffee Marathon 2026, is scheduled for October 3 and is expected to attract thousands of runners, socialites and international guests. But it is not the marathon itself causing shockwaves. It is the staggering price tag attached to the event.Sources familiar with the project claim organizers have already committed more than $4 million toward the function, including nearly $1 million allegedly set aside for the appearance of Tyrese Gibson an aging American singer and actor. Critics are now asking the question burning across Kampala’s political circles:

How exactly does flying in foreign celebrities help farmers in Kanungu, Ntungamo or Bushenyi sell more coffee?The controversy exploded this week after influential political commentators and state house insiders reportedly questioned the wisdom of spending massive sums on entertainment while hospitals, roads and agricultural extension services remain underfunded.One senior government insider, speaking anonymously because of the sensitivity of the matter, claimed that “important people at the top are not amused.”“There is growing concern that some government-linked projects are turning into personal branding exercises instead of national investments,” the source alleged. “The optics are terrible. Millions are being splashed on glamour while citizens are demanding value for money.”According to insiders, Tugume’s close associates have privately advised him to either scale down the marathon or postpone it altogether to avoid provoking powerful figures within the establishment.

“They fear the political environment is changing,” another source claimed. “The era of publicly displaying wealth and spending recklessly with government connections may no longer be tolerated.”The businessman’s industrial coffee project has reportedly received substantial state backing over the years through financing arrangements tied to economic development programs. Supporters argue that the investment was intended to build value addition capacity for Uganda’s coffee sector and create jobs for young people. But critics insist the marathon has become symbolic of a deeper problem — elite extravagance disguised as patriotism.“This is exactly how public trust gets destroyed,” said one Kampala-based political analyst. “You cannot preach economic discipline while organizing celebrity marathons costing millions of dollars.”

Adding fuel to the fire is the memory of last year’s highly publicized coffee marathon, which featured one of East Africa’s biggest music star Diamond Platnumz who was flown in from Tanzania on a chartered plane. The event generated huge excitement online but also triggered backlash from local artists who felt sidelined and underpaid.Several Ugandan performers reportedly complained privately that foreign entertainers were receiving massive appearance fees while local talent was being offered “transport refund money.” One prominent musician even described the arrangement as “economic humiliation.”

When pressed about the controversy in a previous media interview, Tugume reportedly defended the decision, arguing that international stars had stronger negotiating power and larger audiences. “Foreign artists bargain harder,” he allegedly said. “They understand their market value.” That explanation, however, did little to calm critics.Frank Mwesigye a member of Gen Muhoozi Kainerugaba’s pressure group PLU in a post on X has intensified pressure on organizers, accusing them of prioritizing spectacle over substance.Mwesigye and other young people have questioned the logic behind paying enormous sums to foreign celebrities whose relevance among Ugandan youth is debatable.

“How many coffee farmers even know these Hollywood personalities?” he asked during a political discussion broadcast online. “Why not invest that money in local ambassadors, farmer cooperatives or export marketing?”Others have gone further, demanding a formal audit into all activities connected to the marathon and related promotional expenditures.Anti-corruption campaigners argue that while sports tourism and branding are legitimate tools for economic promotion, transparency must remain non-negotiable whenever public-linked funding is involved.“We are not against marathons,” said a governance activist in Kampala. “The issue is accountability. Ugandans deserve to know how these figures are arrived at and what return the country gets from such spending.”

Social media has meanwhile erupted into fierce debate. Supporters of Tugume insist critics are simply jealous of an ambitious entrepreneur trying to position Uganda on the global map. They argue that international events attract investors, media attention and tourism opportunities that ultimately benefit the economy.“People complain when nothing happens and still complain when someone tries something big,” wrote one supporter on X. But opponents say patriotism should not be used as cover for extravagance.Across TikTok, Facebook and X, memes comparing celebrity performance fees to the cost of community health centers and rural roads have gone viral.

Political observers say the growing backlash reflects a broader shift within Uganda’s political atmosphere, where public displays of wealth are increasingly attracting scrutiny amid economic hardship and rising youth frustration.Whether The Coffee Marathon eventually proceeds as planned or not, one thing is certain: the event has already become far bigger than a sports function.It is now a national conversation about power, money, influence and the price of prestige in modern Uganda.And as pressure continues mounting behind closed doors, insiders say all eyes are now fixed on whether organizers will push ahead boldly — or quietly retreat before the storm gets even bigger.

Over four decades, Museveni has transformed Uganda’s political and military establishment into a system revolving almost entirely around his personal authority. Those who fought beside him in the bush war, those who rose within the National Resistance Movement (NRM), and those who appeared to command independent national influence have repeatedly found themselves weakened, sidelined, disgraced, exiled, or politically extinguished.What emerges is a consistent pattern: Museveni elevates ambitious allies when useful, fragments their networks when they become too powerful, and ultimately ensures that no rival institution or personality grows strong enough to threaten his dominance.

The Bush War comrades who fell

Many of Museveni’s earliest and closest comrades from the NRA struggle eventually became casualties of the very revolution they helped build. Below is a microscopic analysis into each of those historicals who have gone AWOL.

Gen David Tinyefuza aka Sejusa

David Tinyefuza was once among the most feared military and intelligence figures in Uganda. As Coordinator of Intelligence Services, he belonged to Museveni’s innermost security circle.But Tinyefuza crossed a dangerous line in 2013 when he publicly warned about what he called the “Muhoozi Project” — an allegedsuccession plan intended to prepare Museveni’s son, Muhoozi Kainerugaba, for power.

The allegations shook the regime. Security agencies raided media houses that published the claims, including the Red Pepper and Daily Monitor. Tinyefuza fled into exile and was gradually stripped of influence. His fall illustrated a key rule within Museveni’s system: questioning succession is intolerable.Years later, Tinyefuza softened his stance and sought reconciliation with Museveni, a pattern common among former insiders who eventually recognise the futility of confronting the president directly.

Gen Elly Tumwine

Elly Tumwine was one of the most iconic NRA historicals, famed for firing the first shot of the Bush War. For decades he remained influential within the military establishment and Cabinet.

Yet even Tumwine’s standing diminished over time. While he remained publicly loyal, his independent stature gradually faded as Museveni concentrated power around a younger military elite increasingly tied to Muhoozi Kainerugaba.Political analyst Charles Onyango-Obbo once remarked that Museveni’s system survives by ensuring “every powerful figure remains dependent on the president for survival.” That dependency became visible even among the most celebrated NRA veterans.

The Parliamentary Titans Neutralised

Museveni’s mastery has not been limited to the military. Parliament too has repeatedly produced figures who appeared nationally powerful — only to be politically eclipsed.

James Wapakhabulo

James Wapakhabulo emerged in the 1990s as an articulate and charismatic national figure. As Speaker of Parliament, he projected independence and institutional authority.

But his growing stature coincided with increasing tension with the executive. Eventually he was moved out of Parliament into diplomatic assignments, effectively removing him from Uganda’s political frontline.

Francis Ayume

Francis Ayume similarly rose as a respected legal and political figure. Yet like Wapakhabulo, his influence never evolved into a durable independent political bloc capable of challenging State House. Museveni repeatedly used redeployments, patronage, controlled promotions, and strategic isolation to prevent parliamentary leaders from becoming autonomous national actors.The institutional lesson became clear: Parliament could exist, but never as an equal center of power.

The Rise and Fall of Gilbert Bukenya

Perhaps no civilian politician better illustrates Museveni’s ability to manufacture and dismantle political stars than Gilbert Bukenya.As Vice President, Bukenya cultivated a populist image and increasingly appeared to harbour presidential ambitions. His national visibility, particularly in Buganda, gave him growing independent appeal.For a time, Museveni tolerated and even encouraged Bukenya’s rise. But once speculation about succession intensified, pressure mounted against him through corruption investigations and political marginalisation.Bukenya eventually lost the vice presidency, his influence within the NRM declined sharply, and his presidential aspirations faded. Former allies later observed that Museveni often allows ambitious figures to rise just high enough to expose themselves before cutting them down.

The Military Men Who Became Too Powerful

The Ugandan military has always been the backbone of Museveni’s rule. Yet it has also been the arena where potential rivals are most carefully managed.

Gen James Kazini

James Kazini once commanded enormous influence as UPDF commander during Uganda’s military interventions in the Congo. But Kazini’s rapid rise created unease. He later faced corruption accusations, military court proceedings, and political isolation before his violent death in 2009.

Brig Noble Mayombo

Brig Noble Mayombo was regarded as one of the brightest strategists of the NRA generation — intelligent, connected, and politically sophisticated.Many observers quietly viewed him as presidential material. But despite holding influential positions, he never accumulated enough independent power to challenge Museveni directly. His death in 2007 ended speculation about his long-term political future.

Gen Aronda Nyakairima

Gen Aronda Nyakairima represented another formidable military figure. Disciplined, respected, and widely admired within state structures, Gen Aronda appeared to embody institutional professionalism.Yet even Gen Aronda’s transition from military command into civilian politics remained tightly controlled within Museveni’s orbit. His sudden death in 2015 removed another figure sometimes discussed as a stabilising future leader.In each case, powerful officers either died, were disgraced, retired quietly, or remained permanently subordinate to Museveni’s authority.

The Neutralisation of Amama Mbabazi

If any civilian insider appeared capable of mounting a serious internal challenge to Museveni, it was Amama Mbabazi aka Super Minister aka Karyaburu. A historical member of the NRA, former intelligence chief, Attorney General, Secretary General of the NRM, and Prime Minister, Mbabazi accumulated immense influence over decades. By 2014, many within the ruling establishment believed he was positioning himself for succession.

Museveni Responded Decisively

Mbabazi was first removed as Prime Minister, later pushed out as NRM Secretary General, and eventually isolated politically before launching an unsuccessful presidential challenge in 2016.The dismantling of Mbabazi’s network was systematic and ruthless. Cadres aligned with him were purged or intimidated, while state machinery closed ranks around Museveni.His defeat reinforced the message that no internal challenger could outmaneuver the president inside the system he personally designed.

Anita Among and the New Generation

The latest example of this cycle may be Anita Annet Among. Among rose rapidly to become one of the most powerful civilian figures in Uganda, controlling Parliament, patronage networks, and significant political influence.But as her visibility expanded, tensions reportedly emerged within elite circles surrounding succession, corruption scandals, and power balancing inside the NRM.Her recent political difficulties have fueled speculation that Museveni is once again recalibrating the system to prevent any civilian figure from becoming too dominant.Throughout his presidency, Museveni has shown deep suspicion toward strong independent centers of authority — whether military, parliamentary, or civilian.

Museveni as The Sole CONSTANT

In several editorial meetings at the Mighty Red Pepper, our Editor-in-Chief, comrade Richard Tusiime, often reminded us — from editors and middle managers to junior staff — that only he and four others (Arinaitwe Rugyendo, James Mujuni, Patrick Mugumya and Johnson Musinguzi) were the true constants within the company. At any given moment, he asserted, he possessed the absolute power to eject any one of us from the establishment.That philosophy mirrors the central reality of Uganda’s post-1986 political history. Ministers, generals, speakers of parliament, vice presidents, and prime ministers may rise and fall, but President Yoweri Museveni has remained the permanent center — the constant.Former army commander Mugisha Muntu once argued that Uganda’s unresolved transition question remains the country’s greatest political vulnerability. Even within the NRM, succession discussions are often treated as politically dangerous.

The recurring “Muhoozi Project” debate reflects that unresolved tension. Gen David Tinyefuza’s warnings about a possible hereditary transition transformed him from a trusted insider into an outcast of the establishment.Today, however, Muhoozi’s growing military and political influence appears undeniable. International observers increasingly view him as Museveni’s most likely successor.Reuters recently reported that Muhoozi has steadily consolidated influence within the military while critics inside the establishment have been sidelined.

The Wall Street Journal similarly described him as the centerpiece of Uganda’s uncertain succession politics.Ironically, the possibility once dismissed as conspiracy theory by regime loyalists now appears increasingly plausible.

Summary

From Tinyefuza to Mbabazi, from Bukenya to Kazini, from Wapakhabulo to Among, Uganda’s political history under Museveni reveals a recurring doctrine of power preservation.Museveni’s greatest political skill has not merely been winning elections or commanding the military. It has been preventing the emergence of any rival strong enough to replace him.Through patronage, intelligence control, military restructuring, selective promotions, legal pressure, political isolation, and strategic humiliation, he has repeatedly dismantled potential successors before they could mature into genuine alternatives.

In the end, Museveni may have achieved something few African leaders have managed for so long: building a political order in which nearly every major figure depends on him — and where even discussions about succession ultimately revolve around his own family.

Watch this space

Officials familiar with the development say the withdrawal of the fleet signals the speed and seriousness with which the establishment is seeking to distance itself from the embattled former Speaker following weeks of intense political turmoil and internal wrangles within the ruling establishment. A senior parliamentary official confirmed that all government vehicles attached to the office had been recalled.“The vehicles have been returned to the Parliament parking yard as part of the transition process. Once a new office bearer is confirmed, new allocations are made according to the established administrative procedures,” a senior official in the Directorate of Transport at Parliament said.

The official declined to comment further on the political implications surrounding the decision but insisted the exercise was “administrative and procedural.”However, insiders close to the former Speaker describe a tense atmosphere at the Nakasero residence, with Among allegedly feeling abandoned by many of her once-loyal political allies.“She is alone and frightened. Many of the people who used to surround her have disappeared ever since the troubles intensified,” one source familiar with the developments said.

 Eviction next

Sources also revealed that Among has formally been notified to vacate the Speaker’s official residence to pave way for renovations and preparations for the incoming occupant. The official residence, located in the upscale Nakasero neighborhood, has traditionally housed Speakers of Parliament during their tenure in office.According to insiders, the decision to remove Among from the residence earlier than expected was partly influenced by fears surrounding alleged traditional rituals and accusations of witchcraft that have recently dominated political discussions among senior government officials.

“She has to vacate that house for renovation before the new Speaker comes in,” a highly placed source said on condition of anonymity. “There were concerns raised about possible traditional rituals and the need to spiritually cleanse and reorganize the residence before another occupant takes over.”

Juju fears

The allegations emerged from what sources described as a dramatic closed-door meeting at State House chaired by President Yoweri Museveni. The meeting reportedly brought together several senior political figures to discuss the growing tensions within Parliament and the ruling National Resistance Movement (NRM).Multiple sources familiar with the meeting claim that the issue of witchcraft and spiritual attacks unexpectedly dominated parts of the discussion.

According to insiders, Among allegedly attributed many of her political troubles and recent misfortunes to alleged witchcraft orchestrated by her predecessor, Rebecca Alitwala Kadaga. The accusations reportedly shocked several attendees at the meeting.“Among accused Kadaga of sending spiritual attacks against her and frustrating her leadership,” a source briefed on the proceedings claimed. “She reportedly said some of the problems she has faced were not ordinary political disagreements.”But Kadaga, a veteran politician and former Speaker herself, is said to have rejected the accusations and instead turned the blame back on Among. Sources claim Kadaga accused her successor of attempting to bewitch members of her family and inner circle during the height of their political disagreements.

The sensational claims have since become the subject of intense discussion within political circles, exposing the deep mistrust and bitter rivalry that has existed between the two powerful women over the years.Although none of the parties involved has publicly commented on the allegations, insiders say security and administrative officials are taking the matter seriously enough to ensure an expedited transition at the Speaker’s residence.“The government does not want to take chances,” another source said. “There is a desire to completely reset the residence before the next Speaker occupies it.”

Political analysts say the developments reflect the dramatic fall of a once-powerful political figure who until recently commanded enormous influence both within Parliament and the ruling party structures.Among rose rapidly through the political ranks and became one of the most influential figures in government after replacing Kadaga as Speaker. Her tenure, however, became increasingly controversial amid accusations of abuse of office, corruption allegations and bitter factional fights inside Parliament.

In recent months, the political pressure surrounding her leadership intensified, with critics accusing her administration of high-handedness and poor management of parliamentary affairs. Several scandals and public disagreements further weakened her standing among senior party figures.

Speedy transition

The withdrawal of official vehicles and the directive to vacate the residence are now being interpreted by many observers as symbolic signs that the political establishment has already moved on.At Parliament, some staff members privately expressed shock at the speed of the transition. “It is unusual for a Speaker to lose access to official facilitation before formally handing over office,” one parliamentary employee noted. “Usually there is a more gradual transition.”Others, however, defended the move as necessary to protect government property and ensure a smooth handover process.

Despite the uncertainty surrounding her future, Among has remained largely silent publicly, avoiding direct engagement with the media as speculation over her next political move continues to grow.Sources close to her insist she remains defiant and believes she has been unfairly targeted by rivals within the political establishment. However, with official privileges rapidly disappearing and allies keeping their distance, the former Speaker now finds herself navigating one of the most difficult periods of her political career.

As the transition unfolds, attention is increasingly turning toward who will occupy the powerful office next and whether the turbulence surrounding Among’s exit will leave lasting scars within Uganda’s political landscape.