The arrests come days after disturbing videos and photographs surfaced online showing Gondodyo being viciously attacked by a group of men who accused him of theft.According to Police Spokesperson ACP Rusoke Kituuma, investigators are still hunting for additional suspects captured in the footage.

“We have now a total of eight in custody and when the investigations are done they will be arraigned before court,” Kituuma said.The development has been welcomed by thousands of Ugandans who have been demanding swift action against those responsible for the player’s death.

HUNT FOR KILLERS CONTINUES

Police say the operation to track down suspects is far from over. Kituuma revealed that detectives from Kampala Metropolitan Police have been analysing mobile phone records, CCTV footage and videos shared on social media to identify everyone who participated in the fatal assault.

“The hunt for suspects is ongoing and we are glad that the public has taken a keen interest in identifying them,” Kituuma said. He added that those seen actively participating in the attack would all face the law. “They cannot hide forever.”The police spokesperson warned Ugandans against taking the law into their own hands, saying participation in mob justice can result in murder charges.

KEY SUSPECT IDENTIFIED

As investigations gather momentum, one of the most wanted suspects has been identified as Mugwisa Obed, a boda boda rider said to operate near Froebel Road in Ntinda. His photographs have been widely circulated online by activists and concerned citizens.Several social media users have urged members of the public to share information regarding his whereabouts with Kiira Road Police Station.

Police have neither confirmed nor denied whether the suspect is among the eight already arrested.The circulation of photographs and videos has become a crucial tool in helping investigators track down those involved in the deadly assault.

A NATION IN MOURNING

The death of Gondodyo has left Uganda’s rugby fraternity devastated. The towering athlete was not only a Rugby Cranes star but also a respected player for Black Pirates Rugby Club, where teammates describe him as disciplined, hardworking and humble.Many Ugandans continue to struggle to comprehend how a national sports figure could be beaten to death in broad daylight while onlookers watched. Former RCC Herbert Anderson Burora expressed deep anguish over the tragedy.

“Death is an invisible monster. It makes life meaningless. Dreams buried, breadwinner buried, father buried, husband buried, rugby player buried. All buried in an incident that should not have happened,” Burora lamented.

In another emotional post, Burora questioned the mindset of the attackers. “One would think that muscles are meant to protect. Why would such a man capable of standing in the middle of a conflict and resolve it instead turn and use the same energy to end life?”His comments have resonated with many Ugandans who believe the attack represented a complete breakdown of humanity.

PUBLIC DEMANDS TOUGH ACTION

News of the arrests sparked a wave of reactions online, with many Ugandans calling for swift prosecution of all suspects. Petite Mukiga, one of the social media users following the case closely, welcomed the arrests.”Not a bad start. We need them arraigned before the public,” she wrote. Another user, Shabilz’s Engineer, praised police for taking action.

“Thanks for serving this beautiful country and we are extremely happy to hear such good news.”

Nickson Karuhura simply responded: “Thank you Afande.”

Others however demanded greater transparency. Ramah Kizito challenged investigators to produce the suspects. “First show us this one we believe,” he posted.Kateregga questioned why police had not publicly paraded those arrested. “You always parade petty suspects but it’s on these criminals where you draw the line?” he asked.

ANGER BOILS OVER

While many welcomed the arrests, others expressed outrage over the brutality of the killing.Prossy Nuwatuha posted an emotional reaction reflecting the anger felt by many Ugandans.

“Give them to us… we get to work and show them where Uganda is heading as a country.”

Human rights activists have however warned against retaliatory violence, insisting that suspects must face justice through the courts.Several civil society actors say Gondodyo’s death should serve as a wake-up call for authorities to intensify public education about the dangers of mob justice.

ACTIVISTS SPEAK OUT

Human rights campaigners say the tragedy highlights a growing crisis in Uganda’s urban centres where suspects are often punished before investigations are conducted.Many activists argue that citizens have increasingly lost confidence in lawful processes, leading to dangerous forms of vigilante justice.

One activist involved in tracking suspects said public cooperation has played a major role in identifying individuals captured in the viral footage.The activist noted that every person who participated in the attack, whether by physically assaulting Gondodyo or encouraging the violence, should be held accountable.

CALL FOR CIVIC EDUCATION

Media personality Daniel Lutaaya used the tragedy to call for widespread civic education.”The saddest thing is that the monsters who denied Sydney due process will be accorded due process,” Lutaaya wrote.

He argued that many Ugandans do not fully understand the law and the consequences of mob action. “We have a responsibility as citizens to educate these boda people. Every time you sit on one, it is an opportunity for you to give them some positive information.”

Lutaaya further said the country must work harder to prevent similar incidents.”Never again should a young family lose a father over mob justice.”

FAMILY AWAITS JUSTICE

As police continue making arrests, Gondodyo’s grieving family is still struggling to come to terms with the loss of a husband, father and provider.Friends say the rugby star leaves behind a young family that depended on him for support and guidance.

For now, the family’s focus remains on ensuring that everyone involved in the killing is brought to book.The eight arrests mark a significant breakthrough, but many Ugandans believe justice will only be served when every individual captured in the shocking videos stands before a court of law.

Until then, the haunting images of Sydney Gondodyo’s final moments will continue to remind the nation of the deadly consequences of mob justice and the urgent need to protect the rule of law. “They cannot hide forever,” ACP Rusoke Kituuma has vowed.For Gondodyo’s family, teammates and supporters, those words offer a glimmer of hope that justice may finally be within reach.

The swearing-in exercise was coordinated by Lucy Nakyobe Mbonye, the Head of Public Service and Secretary to Cabinet, who guided ministers through the official procedures before they signed government documents.One after another, ministers stepped forward to take the oath of allegiance and the oath of office, pledging to uphold the Constitution and serve the people of Uganda faithfully.

BIG NAMES TAKE OATH

Vice President Maj. (Rtd) Jessica Alupo was among the first senior leaders to take the oath and officially begin another term in office.Prime Minister Robinah Nabbanja also took the oath before President Museveni, followed by First Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for East African Affairs Rebecca Kadaga.

Dr. Crispus Walter Kiyonga was sworn in as Second Deputy Prime Minister and Deputy Leader of Government Business in Parliament.Several senior ministers also took the oath, including Kiryowa Kiwanuka as Minister of Defence and Veteran Affairs, Norbert Mao as Minister of Justice and Constitutional Affairs, and Dr. Jane Ruth Aceng as Government Chief Whip.

Others sworn in included Frank Tumwebaze as Minister of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries, Hillary Onek as Minister in the Office of the Prime Minister in charge of General Duties, Sam Engola as Minister for Relief, Disaster Preparedness and Refugees, and Judith Nabakooba as Minister of Lands, Housing and Urban Development.Businessman and legislator Sanjay Tanna officially joined Cabinet after being sworn in as Minister of Trade, Industry and Cooperatives.

Jim Muhwezi took oath as Minister in the Office of the President in charge of Security while Balaam Barugahara Ateenyi was sworn in as Minister for Local Government.Hajjat Minsa Kabanda assumed office as Minister for Kampala Capital City and Metropolitan Affairs. Lt. Gen. Henry Tumukunde returned to Cabinet after taking oath as Minister of Gender, Labour and Social Development.Engineer Jonard Assimwe was sworn in as Minister in charge of Science, Technology and Innovation while Justine Kasule Lumumba took oath as Minister for ICT and National Guidance.

Dr. Chris Baryomunsi also took oath and officially assumed duties as Minister of Health.

MUSEVENI DEMANDS HARD WORK

Addressing the newly sworn-in ministers, President Museveni said the new Cabinet had a responsibility to ensure that government programmes benefited ordinary Ugandans.He said ministers should focus on service delivery, wealth creation and fighting corruption.

Museveni said Ugandans expected results from their leaders and urged ministers to closely monitor government projects. He noted that public resources should be used responsibly and warned against wastefulness.

The President further said government would continue implementing programmes aimed at transforming the country’s economy and improving household incomes.Political observers said the President’s message showed that he expected strict accountability from members of his new Cabinet.

FOUR MINISTERS MISS CEREMONY

Despite the successful ceremony, four ministerial appointees did not take the oath. Lucy Nakyobe told guests that 78 Cabinet members were available and ready to take oath while one minister was indisposed.She explained that four other ministers had been engaged by her office and the Solicitor General over issues relating to their status and that a report had been submitted to the President for guidance.

Her remarks immediately sparked discussion among guests and political observers about the future of the affected ministers.Government officials, however, maintained that all legal procedures were being followed before any final decisions were made.

NAKYOBE PRAISED FOR SMOOTH ORGANISATION

Many guests praised Lucy Nakyobe for ensuring that the swearing-in ceremony proceeded smoothly. Throughout the event, she coordinated protocol teams, directed ministers and supervised all official documentation.

Several officials described her as the key figure behind the successful organisation of one of the most important government functions of the year. Her calm handling of the ceremony earned admiration from many attendees.

FAMILIES CELEBRATE

The occasion was also a proud moment for families of the newly sworn-in ministers. Relatives and supporters were seen taking photographs and congratulating their loved ones after the ceremony. For first-time ministers such as Jonard Assimwe and Sanjay Tanna, the day marked a major milestone in their political careers.Many ministers spent time celebrating with family members shortly after completing the oath-taking exercise.

As the ceremony came to an end, Uganda’s new Cabinet officially began work amid growing expectations from citizens who want improved service delivery, better healthcare, more jobs and accelerated economic development.With President Museveni already demanding performance and accountability, attention now turns to whether the newly sworn-in ministers will deliver on the promises made to Ugandans.

But as the cameras rolled and ministers lined up to take their oaths, four notable faces were missing. Foreign Affairs Minister-designate Adonia Ayebare, State Minister-designate for Foreign Affairs (International Affairs) Calvin Echodu, State Minister-designate for Microfinance Shartsi Kutesa Musherure and State Minister-designate for Internal Affairs Lawrence Muganga were all absent from the ceremony.Their no-show immediately fueled speculation that the controversy surrounding their citizenship status had not yet been resolved.

PUBLIC SERVICE OFFICIALS RAISE RED FLAG

Highly placed government sources revealed that officials from the Ministry of Public Service advised against swearing in any nominee whose citizenship documentation and renunciation processes had not been fully concluded.The development comes amid heightened scrutiny over ministers and public officials who have previously held foreign citizenship.

According to sources familiar with the matter, government lawyers are currently reviewing whether merely initiating the renunciation of foreign citizenship satisfies Uganda’s constitutional requirements or whether a nominee must first obtain formal confirmation from the foreign country concerned before taking up ministerial office.”The legal position is still being scrutinized,” said a senior government source who requested anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly on the matter.

“The concern is whether a person who has started the process but has not yet received final approval can legally assume office. Government does not want to make mistakes that could later be challenged in court.”The issue has become particularly sensitive because ministers occupy some of the highest offices in government and are expected to meet all constitutional requirements before assuming their duties.

MUGANGA GETS BREATHING SPACE

Among those most affected by the controversy is Dr. Lawrence Muganga, whose nomination for the Internal Affairs docket has generated intense public debate. Sources say the delay may provide Muganga with valuable time to reorganize his affairs and complete processes related to the citizenships he reportedly holds outside Uganda.

Political insiders say the postponement could prove critical as lawyers and government officials seek clarity on the status of his foreign citizenship documentation.The controversy surrounding Muganga intensified during parliamentary vetting, where questions were raised about his alleged possession of citizenship documents from Rwanda and Canada in addition to Uganda.

While Muganga has publicly maintained his commitment to serving Uganda, critics argue that the legal requirements governing dual and multiple citizenship must be strictly enforced.Supporters, however, insist that the issue should be resolved through legal channels rather than political attacks.

GOVERNMENT SEEKS TO AVOID CONSTITUTIONAL EMBARRASSMENT

Political observers believe the government is attempting to avoid a constitutional crisis by delaying the swearing-in until all legal questions have been settled.Political analyst Sarah Bireete says the controversy demonstrates the need for greater transparency regarding citizenship declarations by public officials.”Ugandans need clarity on the requirements for holding public office. The law should be applied consistently regardless of the individual’s status or political connections,” she said.

Emerging political analyst, Tamale Mirundi Junior, argued that the government’s cautious approach may be intended to protect itself from future legal challenges.”If these ministers are sworn in before all legal questions are resolved, opponents could challenge their appointments in court. Government appears to be trying to avoid such a scenario,” he observed.Analysts note that any successful court challenge against a minister could create administrative confusion and damage public confidence in government institutions.

OPPOSITION DEMANDS ANSWERS

The absence of the four nominees has also attracted attention from opposition politicians, who are demanding greater transparency regarding the status of the ministers.Several opposition figures argue that Ugandans deserve to know whether the nominees fully satisfy constitutional requirements before they assume office.

They have called upon relevant government agencies to publicly clarify the status of the citizenship verification process.The matter is expected to remain a subject of political debate in the coming days as government lawyers continue reviewing the legal implications.

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

Sources indicate that the four nominees could be sworn in separately once the citizenship concerns are conclusively addressed.However, officials caution that the timing will depend on the outcome of ongoing legal reviews and the completion of any outstanding renunciation procedures.

For now, the four ministers remain in political limbo as they wait for a final determination on whether they have met all requirements necessary to take office.Their absence from Monday’s ceremony has turned what was meant to be a celebratory occasion into a fresh political controversy that is likely to dominate national discussion.

As President Museveni’s new Cabinet begins work, many Ugandans will be closely watching to see whether the four missing ministers eventually take their oaths or whether the citizenship saga claims its first political casualties.One thing is certain: the citizenship question has emerged as one of the most explosive issues facing the new administration, and until it is resolved, the political spotlight will remain firmly fixed on Ayebare, Echodu, Musherure and Muganga.

According to family members, Babirye was last seen at Busunju where she boarded a taxi on Wednesday. What initially appeared to be a normal journey soon turned into a nightmare when she disappeared without a trace.Relatives spent hours calling her phone and searching for her in hospitals, police stations and among friends, but there was no sign of the missing woman.

The situation took a sinister turn when unknown individuals reportedly contacted the family claiming to be holding Babirye captive. The kidnappers allegedly demanded a staggering Shs19 million ransom in exchange for her freedom.With fears growing that her life was in danger, the devastated family scrambled to raise money from relatives, friends and well-wishers.

Despite financial challenges, the family managed to mobilize Shs8 million, hoping the payment would convince the captors to release their loved one.However, the family says the money was paid in vain. Instead of returning Babirye safely home, the suspected kidnappers allegedly murdered her and dumped her body in Kakiri, sending shockwaves through the community. “We did everything we could to save her,” a grieving family member said.

“We begged for mercy. We raised money and followed the instructions we were given because we believed she would come back alive. It is painful that after all that, they still killed her.”Another relative described the deceased as a caring and hardworking woman whose death has left an irreplaceable gap in the family.

“She was loved by many people. We have lost a sister, a daughter and a friend. We want justice and we want those responsible to be arrested,” the relative said through tears.

POLICE SPEAK OUT

Police have confirmed the tragic development and say investigations into the circumstances surrounding Babirye’s death are ongoing. According to Kampala Metropolitan Police Deputy Spokesperson, Luke Owoyesigyire, security agencies are actively pursuing leads that could help identify and apprehend the suspects behind the crime.”We are investigating the circumstances under which the deceased disappeared and was later found dead. We urge members of the public to remain calm as investigations continue,” Owoyesigyire said.

He further appealed to anyone with information that may assist investigators to come forward and cooperate with police.The police spokesperson noted that detectives are examining communication records, witness statements and other evidence that could shed light on the victim’s final movements.Residents of Busunju and Kakiri have also been urged to share any information that may help investigators piece together the timeline leading to the gruesome killing.

FEAR AND ANGER

News of Babirye’s death spread rapidly across social media, where Ugandans expressed outrage and sorrow over the incident.Many questioned how criminals could allegedly receive money from a victim’s family and still proceed to kill her.

Others called for tougher measures against kidnapping syndicates that continue to terrorize innocent citizens.Security experts have repeatedly warned members of the public to remain vigilant, especially when travelling alone or responding to suspicious calls demanding money.

The incident has once again highlighted the emotional torture families endure when loved ones disappear under mysterious circumstances.For Babirye’s family, the pain is compounded by the fact that they believed the ransom payment would save her life.

Instead, they are now preparing for burial arrangements while struggling to come to terms with the shocking loss.”We never imagined we would be receiving her body instead of welcoming her home,” a relative said.”Every phone call gave us hope. Every minute we waited we believed she would return. Now all we have are memories.”

CALLS FOR JUSTICE

Community leaders and residents have joined the family in demanding swift justice. Several residents described the killing as barbaric and called upon security agencies to intensify efforts against criminal gangs operating in and around Kampala and Wakiso districts.

As investigators continue their work, mourners have gathered at the family’s home to comfort relatives and pay tribute to the deceased.Friends remembered Babirye as a humble woman who always put others first and was known for her kindness and generosity.

Her death now joins a growing list of criminal incidents that have left many Ugandans worried about their safety.For the grieving family, however, the focus remains on ensuring that those responsible are brought before the courts.

“They took her from us in the most cruel way possible,” a family member said.”We cannot bring her back, but we pray that the people who did this are arrested and punished. That is the only justice Babirye deserves.”As police investigations continue, a nation waits for answers surrounding the tragic final journey of Babirye Lydia Sengendo—a journey that began with a taxi ride in Busunju and ended in heartbreak at Kakiri.

The disturbing images, now circulating widely on social media, allegedly show a middle-aged man dressed in a yellow jersey lifting a massive tree trunk-like wooden log above his head before bringing it down on the helpless rugby player.The chilling photographs have triggered fresh anger and renewed calls for justice as police intensify efforts to track down every individual involved in the savage attack.

THE KILLER BLOW

In one of the most shocking images, the suspect can be seen standing over Gondodyo, who appears to be kneeling on the ground with one hand raised. The rugby star appears defenseless.The man in the yellow shirt is seen holding a thick wooden object over his head in a posture suggesting he is about to strike.

Observers who have studied the pictures say the log appears heavy enough to inflict catastrophic injuries. Sources familiar with the medical assessment of Gondodyo’s injuries say the force used during the attack was devastating.”The injuries visible in the footage suggest severe trauma. The victim was subjected to repeated blows from a dangerous object,” a source familiar with the case said.

The photographs have left many Ugandans asking the same question: How could fellow human beings unleash such violence on an unarmed man?

HORROR IN BROAD DAYLIGHT

Even more disturbing is the fact that the attack happened in broad daylight. People can reportedly be seen around the scene as the mob descended on the rugby star. Instead of handing him over to authorities, the crowd allegedly chose violence.

Social media users who watched the footage described the scenes as “barbaric,” “heartbreaking,” and “unimaginable.”One witness said the mob appeared determined to inflict maximum damage. “The man with the log looked relentless. It was terrifying to watch,” the witness said. The pictures have since become crucial evidence in the ongoing investigation.

POLICE HUNT FOR SUSPECTS

As public outrage grows, police have reportedly widened the search for the men captured in the images and videos. Investigators are said to be analysing footage frame by frame in an effort to identify every participant.

Security sources say detectives are particularly interested in the man seen wielding the large wooden log. The images have become one of the strongest leads in the case. Authorities are appealing to members of the public with information to come forward.The hunt for the suspects has now become a national priority as pressure mounts on law enforcement agencies to ensure accountability.

WAS SYDNEY A VICTIM OF STEREOTYPES?

As tributes continue to pour in, some Ugandans have raised troubling questions about whether Gondodyo was unfairly judged before the mob attacked him. One emotional social media post suggested that harmful stereotypes may have contributed to the tragedy.

“Reflecting on life and the unfortunate death of Sydney, I can’t help but think he might have been a victim of entrenched wrong stereotypes that linger in our society, including being labelled a ‘muyaye’ if you’re a male with dreadlocks or any unconventional hairstyle,” the tribute read. The writer argued that appearances often mislead people.”The more you interact with different persons, you realize that stereotypes don’t talk to the heart or character of a person.”

The post further noted the irony that many individuals implicated in major corruption scandals often appear respectable and well-groomed.

OUTRAGE ACROSS THE COUNTRY

Former opposition leader and rights advocate Winnie Kiiza was among those who condemned the killing. “I watched the heartbreaking video of a young rugby player, Sydney Gondodyo, being lynched by a mob. This kind of primitive behaviour has no place in any civilized society. I hope police bring every single perpetrator to justice. Rest in peace, Sydney. This is deeply tragic.”Her comments echoed the feelings of thousands of Ugandans shocked by the gruesome incident.

“STOP MOB JUSTICE!”

Social media activist Aiden Official also condemned the killing. “Another disturbing video circulating. This is exactly why we must stop mob justice.”

He called for immediate arrests and urged citizens to hand suspects over to police rather than taking matters into their own hands. “Taking the law into our own hands only creates more criminals and destroys the rule of law.”The message resonated with many who fear that mob violence is becoming increasingly common.

THE MAN IN YELLOW

Perhaps no individual has attracted more attention than the suspect in the yellow jersey. Many online users expressed disbelief at the ferocity displayed in the pictures.

One user identified as Dave wrote: “But that guy in yellow shirt has a family really how can you? It’s so heartbreaking.” Another commenter, Sam Awori, questioned the suspect’s motives.

“He should be the one snatched the bag and he’s erasing the evidence by having the witnesses dead.” While such claims remain unverified, they demonstrate the intense public anger generated by the images.

A LIFE CUT SHORT

Friends and teammates have described Gondodyo as a talented sportsman whose future looked bright. The Black Pirates player had earned admiration on and off the rugby pitch and was regarded as one of the country’s promising rugby talents. His death has sent shockwaves through Uganda’s sporting community.Tributes from fellow players, fans and officials continue to pour in as preparations begin to lay him to rest.

JUSTICE FOR SYDNEY

Legal observers say the investigation will now focus on identifying individual acts committed during the attack and determining criminal responsibility. Many Ugandans are demanding that those responsible face the full force of the law. One social media user summed up the national mood: “Let them track that man down cos you can’t take justice in your hands like this.”

As detectives continue their hunt, the haunting image of a man raising a massive wooden log over a kneeling Sydney Gondodyo remains etched in the minds of many Ugandans.For a nation already mourning the loss of a rugby star, the photographs have transformed grief into outrage. And as the search for the suspects gathers pace, one cry is growing louder across the country:

Justice for Sydney Gondodyo.

News of Sebina’s death spread rapidly across social media, leaving fans, fellow content creators and friends in shock. Tributes have continued to pour in from across the country as many struggle to come to terms with the sudden loss of a young man who brought laughter and joy to countless Ugandans.Sebina rose to prominence through TikTok, where his creative content, relatable storytelling and infectious sense of humor made him a household name among followers of Uganda’s rapidly growing digital entertainment scene. His videos often attracted significant engagement, earning him admiration from audiences both within Uganda and beyond.

To many of his followers, Sebina was more than just a content creator. He represented the dreams of a new generation of young Ugandans using social media platforms to build careers, inspire others and connect with audiences through authentic storytelling.Friends describe him as a humble, hardworking and determined individual who remained committed to creating content despite the challenges often faced by digital creators. His ability to transform everyday experiences into entertaining videos helped him build a loyal fan base that eagerly awaited each new post.

As news of his passing emerged, social media timelines were flooded with messages of sorrow. Fellow TikTok creators, musicians, comedians and fans shared memories of their interactions with him, describing him as a kind-hearted person who was always willing to support others in the industry.Among those who paid tribute was veteran journalist and Yaya Xtra member Jako Waluluka, who remembered Sebina as a loyal friend whose humor brightened many lives.

“He has been an entertaining young man with a penchant for life and comedy. He loved the bottle at will and I miss his humour. Above all, his loyalty was not questionable. We will miss him as Yaya Xtra,” Waluluka said. Yaya Xtra CEO Stanley Ndaula also joined the growing list of mourners, describing Sebina as a vibrant personality whose presence energized every gathering he attended. Ndaula said the Yaya Xtra fraternity had lost not only a supporter but also a brother whose passion for entertainment and friendship touched many people.

Many remembered Sebina’s infectious smile, his energetic personality and his passion for entertaining people. Others recalled how he used his growing influence to encourage fellow young people to pursue their talents and embrace opportunities in the digital economy.His death comes at a time when Uganda’s content creation industry is experiencing remarkable growth, with many young creators looking up to pioneers and trendsetters like Sebina. His contribution to the development of online entertainment in Uganda will undoubtedly remain part of his legacy.

While details surrounding the circumstances leading to his death remain limited, family members, friends and followers have continued to call for respect, privacy and dignity as they mourn his passing.The loss of Sebina serves as a painful reminder of how fragile life can be. Only days ago, he was engaging audiences through his content, making people laugh and creating memorable moments for his followers. Today, the same platforms that celebrated his creativity have become spaces of mourning and remembrance.

As preparations for his final farewell begin, many are choosing to focus on the positive impact he made during his lifetime. His videos, memories and influence on Uganda’s social media landscape will continue to live on through the countless people whose lives he touched.

Though his journey has ended far too soon, Sebina leaves behind a legacy of creativity, resilience and entertainment. His contribution to Uganda’s digital culture will not be forgotten.The content creation community has lost one of its own. Uganda has lost a talented entertainer. Family and friends have lost a beloved son, brother and companion. May the soul of Musaazi Charles Kalooli, alias Sebina, rest in eternal peace.

Sources say Gondodyo, who is set to be buried on Tuesday in Bugiri, suffered severe injuries and internal bleeding after being repeatedly assaulted by a group reportedly made up largely of boda boda riders.”The gang rounded him up and thoroughly beat him. They accused him of snatching a handbag of one of their clients,” a source familiar with the incident revealed.

However, investigators have not officially confirmed the circumstances that triggered the attack, and multiple voices on social media are raising the possibility that Gondodyo may have been a victim of mistaken identity. “The mob just descended on him and beat him repetitively,” another source said.What makes the tragedy even more chilling is that Gondodyo had reportedly just attended a birthday celebration for his son in Lugogo shortly before the attack.

Witnesses say police arrived after the mob had already inflicted devastating injuries on the rugby star. Footage circulating online appears to show officers placing Gondodyo onto a police pickup truck. Many Ugandans have reacted angrily to the images.”He was thrown on a police truck like a sack of lumonde. That is our professional PoliceUg,” posted X user Wounded Ugandan.

The gruesome death has triggered an emotional national conversation about mob justice, public safety and the growing power of boda boda gangs in Kampala. One social media user summed up the anger being felt across the country.”A national team star murdered in cold blood by a rowdy mob on the streets of Kampala in the 2pm sun! We’re at a point of lynching a national team player with stones, pavers, wood and metal on the streets of the capital? Where exactly did we go wrong as a country?”

DID HE REALLY SNATCH A BAG?

As police investigations continue, fierce debate has erupted online over the allegations that Gondodyo was involved in a handbag snatching incident. Many of those who knew him insist such claims are impossible.

Ronald Atugonza wrote: “He wasn’t your usual street kid. He grew up in one of the rich families in the heart of Mbale City. He worked and played professional rugby on salaries and stipends. What would be in the bag that would interest Sydney to steal it? He was no thief in the first place.” Another user, One Conrad T, echoed similar sentiments. “No he didn’t and could never according to those who know him. What I know is that boda guys are using this same tactic to rob many people. Some survive and others actually succumb to immense injuries. I pray the recordings expose the real culprits.”

Questions are also being raised about the mysterious woman whose bag was allegedly stolen.”Who is the girl whose bag was allegedly snatched? I think the investigation should start from there,” wrote Mr Zecco. Others suggested the entire incident may have been a setup.Ray posted: “They say it was a woman’s bag but why do you think it’s a man asking for it? They set bro up to steal from him.” Enock David Kabonge added: “I think they took advantage of his looks, called him a snatcher and then stole his car.”

MOB JUSTICE OR MURDER?

Regardless of whether Gondodyo was innocent or guilty of any offence, many Ugandans are unanimous on one point: nobody deserves to be beaten to death by a mob. King Dickse condemned what happened as “trial without jury.” “They beat you to death only to discover later that they’re beating the wrong culprit,” he wrote.

Frank Kagabo was equally furious. “Even if he did, does anyone have a right to extrajudicially kill a suspect? Or any human being whatever the case? Such a mentality is what leads to this.”Sesan also argued that law enforcement institutions must work harder to restore public confidence. “Even if he did, nobody has a right to inflict pain on another person. Police must become professional to listen to all people with fairness and care. This will reduce mob justice.”

SPORTS COMMUNITY IN MOURNING

The death has sent shockwaves through Uganda’s rugby fraternity. Friends, teammates and supporters describe Gondodyo as a cheerful and talented athlete whose future was still bright.One supporter wrote: “Man that can’t be involved in such acts. He was a jolly guy, a national rugby player known by many.”

Another added: “Please respect him by not asking stupid questions just for clout and likes. He was a national treasure in many ways you’ll never comprehend.”Many supporters have also pointed to Gondodyo’s recent rugby engagements and questioned why an established national athlete would suddenly resort to petty crime.

“Why would he get out of a luxury car to snatch a pedestrian’s bag?” asked Ndawula Jonathan-Juuko. The unanswered questions surrounding the incident have only deepened the mystery.

POLICE SWING INTO ACTION

Police spokesperson Kituuma Rusoke confirmed that arrests have already been made. “We have made some arrests in respect to this wanton act. More will be made to bring all the perpetrators to book. A detailed statement will be issued in due course,” he posted on X. The announcement has been welcomed by many Ugandans, although others insist that every person involved in the attack must be identified and prosecuted.As detectives sift through videos and witness accounts, pressure is mounting on authorities to establish exactly what happened in the moments leading up to the fatal beating.

NATION DEMANDS ANSWERS

The death of Sydney Gondodyo has once again thrust the issue of mob justice into the national spotlight. For many Ugandans, the tragedy is about more than the death of a rugby player. It is a warning about a society where accusations can quickly turn into death sentences before investigations are conducted.

Whether Gondodyo was an innocent man caught in the wrong place at the wrong time or whether there was another chain of events leading to the attack, one fact remains undeniable: a father, son, friend and national athlete is dead. And as mourners prepare to lay him to rest in Bugiri, a grieving nation is left asking one haunting question: Who will be held accountable for the mob that turned a busy Kampala street into a killing ground?

In a dramatic move that shocked many Ugandans, the former ministerial nominee travelled to his ancestral home in Seeta, Mukono, accompanied by outspoken social commentator Frank Gashumba, bloggers, journalists and supporters in what appeared to be a carefully choreographed effort to convince the country that he is genuinely Ugandan.

But instead of generating sympathy, the emotional visit to his parents’ graves has triggered fierce backlash, with critics accusing Muganga of avoiding the real issue that cost him a ministerial appointment in the first place.The Victoria University Vice Chancellor recently suffered a major setback after Parliament’s Appointments Committee rejected his nomination for the influential position of State Minister for Internal Affairs. The rejection followed questions surrounding his citizenship status after reports emerged linking him to Ugandan, Canadian and Rwandan citizenship.

Sources familiar with the vetting process say committee members repeatedly sought evidence showing that any foreign citizenships had been legally renounced where required by law.While other nominees reportedly produced documentation demonstrating compliance with citizenship requirements, Muganga allegedly failed to satisfy lawmakers that his status met the legal threshold required for such a sensitive office.

GRAVES, CAMERAS AND EMOTIONS

Facing growing criticism, Muganga appeared determined to prove his Ugandan roots. Enter Frank Gashumba. The outspoken activist reportedly mobilized bloggers, journalists and social media influencers to accompany Muganga to Mukono, where cameras captured emotional scenes as the academic visited the graves of his late parents.

Videos quickly flooded social media platforms. Supporters described the scenes as moving and emotional. Some viewers claimed Muganga became visibly emotional while paying tribute to his parents. For a brief moment, it appeared the strategy might soften public opinion. Then the backlash began.

“THAT WAS NEVER THE ISSUE!”

Almost immediately, critics questioned why a debate about citizenship law was suddenly being transformed into a discussion about ancestry, lineage and ethnicity.

Political analyst Hussein Kashillingi emerged among the strongest voices challenging Muganga’s approach. “Muganga is undermining a legitimate debate by framing it as discrimination against him as a Munyarwanda. That is not the issue,” Kashillingi argued.”The question is whether Uganda’s Constitution and laws permit a person with that citizenship history to hold certain offices, including that of Minister. That is the debate—not ethnicity.”

His comments resonated with many Ugandans who argued that nobody had questioned where Muganga’s parents were buried or whether he had family roots in Uganda. According to critics, Parliament simply wanted answers about citizenship documentation.Social commentator King Melvin was even harsher. “A whole PhD humiliating himself at his parents’ graves over a ministerial position in a dysfunctional country,” he wrote.”Nobody contested his Ugandanness. The issue is whether someone who currently holds allegiance to another country can sit at the table making decisions on immigration, citizenship and internal security.”

SARAH BIREETE: THIS IS POLITICS OF DESPERATION

Among the most influential interventions came from governance activist Sarah Bireete, who used the controversy to highlight what she described as Uganda’s growing culture of elite desperation for political appointments.

In a lengthy social media statement, Bireete argued that Uganda’s governance crisis is increasingly fueled by elites who remain silent about national problems in order to preserve their chances of securing government appointments.”The scramble for political appointments has turned large sections of the country’s elite into cautious spectators rather than principled voices,” she argued.

According to Bireete, political office has become so financially and socially rewarding that many professionals now view government appointments as more attractive than prestigious careers built over decades. She pointed directly to the Muganga controversy as an example of this wider problem.”This distortion explains why, for some elites, a junior political appointment can now appear more attractive than a prestigious academic position such as a vice chancellorship,” she wrote.

“For someone like Dr. Muganga, the calculus reflects a wider structural problem: politics now promises faster financial security and elite relevance than decades of professional excellence.”Her comments quickly spread across social media, generating intense debate. Some agreed that the fierce battle over a ministerial appointment reflected the enormous benefits attached to public office.Others defended Muganga, insisting his efforts were simply intended to correct public misconceptions about his identity.

LEGAL QUESTIONS OR EMOTIONAL SYMBOLISM?

Bireete was particularly critical of attempts to use ancestral history as evidence of citizenship.She argued that the debate had been diverted away from constitutional and statutory questions into emotionally charged symbolism. “References to parents’ graves, lineage and cultural belonging have been elevated as proof of citizenship, as though constitutional law were settled by sentiment,” she wrote. “The issue at hand is not emotional attachment to Uganda, nor cultural identity. It is whether the statutory requirements regarding dual citizenship have been complied with.”

Her remarks echoed sentiments expressed by many critics who insisted that graves, emotions and family history could not replace legal documentation.For them, the issue remains straightforward: whether Muganga complied with all citizenship requirements necessary for appointment to a sensitive government office.

SOCIAL MEDIA EXPLODES

The graveyard visit quickly became one of the hottest topics online. Political commentator Charles Rwomushana questioned the apparent desperation surrounding ministerial appointments. “But why are guys so desperate for ministerial appointments?” he asked.

“Is this desperation really about serving the population?” Others openly mocked the entire exercise. “The issue was never about where his parents were buried,” wrote one social media user. “The real question was about dual citizenship, and showing graves does not prove someone’s citizenship status.”

Another commentator questioned why resources were being spent organizing a media procession to a cemetery rather than resolving the legal concerns raised by Parliament.

“How I wish the time, energy and resources used to organize bloggers and journalists to visit family graves had instead been spent resolving the dual citizenship question once and for all,” wrote Patrick Ssekabira.

CONTRADICTIONS RAISE FRESH QUESTIONS

As the debate intensified, critics began revisiting Muganga’s previous public statements. One issue attracting particular attention involved comments he reportedly made during a television appearance several years ago. According to social media users, Muganga stated during an interview that he was born in Butaleja District. Following the Seeta graveyard visit, some critics began questioning what they described as inconsistencies in his personal narrative.

“While appearing on NTV’s On The Spot in 2021, Dr. Muganga stated that he was born in Butaleja District. Yet yesterday he was at his family graves in Seeta,” wrote Ssekabira.”The question many are asking is simple: when did Butaleja become Seeta?” The remarks added yet another layer to an already explosive controversy.

SYMPATHY OR POLITICAL THEATRE?

While supporters continue portraying Muganga as a victim of prejudice, critics insist the cemetery visit amounted to political theatre designed to generate sympathy.For them, graves cannot answer legal questions. Tears cannot replace official documentation.

And ancestral roots cannot substitute constitutional requirements. As social media remains deeply divided, one thing is becoming increasingly clear. The graveyard visit that was supposed to prove Muganga’s Ugandan identity has instead intensified scrutiny of the very questions he was trying to put to rest. Far from burying the controversy, the emotional pilgrimage to Seeta may have dug the citizenship debate even deeper. And as the dust settles, many Ugandans continue asking the same question: Was the country supposed to examine graves—or citizenship papers?

The debate has further exploded after former member of parliament (Kira Municipality) Ibrahim Ssemujju Nganda resurfaced figures he previously cited in Parliament showing the enormous sums various government institutions allegedly pay to properties associated with the business magnate. According to Ssemujju’s calculations, government entities collectively pay approximately Shs2.9 billion every month in rent.

The figures he cited include the Ministry of Justice allegedly paying Shs450 million monthly, the Ministry of ICT Shs320 million, the Ministry of Gender Shs250 million, the Anti-Corruption Court Shs180 million, the Ministry of East African Affairs Shs280 million, Parliament Shs860 million and several other agencies occupying buildings linked to the businessman. If the figures are accurate, the monthly total translates into nearly Shs35 billion annually.

Ssemujju dramatically broke down the numbers further, claiming the amount translates into approximately Shs97 million every day, Shs4 million every hour and about Shs600,000 every minute flowing from government coffers into rent payments.The revelations have sparked outrage among many Ugandans who wonder why government continues paying rent decades after independence while owning large chunks of public land across the country.

UPDF SHOWS A DIFFERENT WAY

Many analysts point to the Uganda People’s Defence Forces as an example of how public institutions can reduce expenditure through long-term planning. The UPDF is currently investing in permanent infrastructure, notably its swanky headquarter at Mbuya hill which is in the final phase of completion, a move expected to save billions of shillings in future rental costs.

Supporters of this approach argue that money previously spent on rent can be redirected toward strategic priorities such as building schools, equipping hospitals, improving security infrastructure and enhancing the welfare of government workers.”Every shilling saved from rent is a shilling that can be invested elsewhere,” said one governance analyst contacted by this publication. Critics say if military planners can think decades ahead by constructing their own facilities, civilian ministries should be doing the same.

“THIS IS THE REAL CORRUPTION”

The issue has ignited fierce debate on social media. Political commentator Dr. Kanakulya Dickson described the situation as part of a much larger problem. “This syndicate is wider and bigger than this and it is the real corruption. The rest are just sideshows delivered every once in a while to divert Ugandans,” he posted.

Another social media user, Peter Bwayo, questioned why government institutions remain concentrated in Kampala. “Can’t those ministries be spread countrywide and they construct their own buildings because we have land in Karamoja at free cost?” he wondered.Others questioned whether the figures being discussed were even possible. “Can someone please look into this? Can this be real?” asked MagicMike.

“WHY IS GOVERNMENT STILL A TENANT?”

One of the strongest reactions came from social media user Alpa Ntibulire. “If an individual was able to own the buildings exposed last month, how come the government she’s been serving remains a tenant?” he asked. Many Ugandans appeared stunned to learn that some government institutions allegedly operate from rented premises. “Wait, we rent the Parliament?” wrote another shocked commentator.

Others suggested that the annual rent expenditure could potentially finance major government construction projects. “When you add it all up, the government could construct its own office buildings in less than a year. Who exactly bewitched this country?” asked another social media user.

CIVIL SOCIETY JOINS DEBATE

Several governance activists have long argued that excessive dependence on rented office space drains public resources.Transparency advocates have repeatedly called for comprehensive audits of government rental expenditures and long-term plans to reduce dependence on private landlords. Some civil society voices argue that public institutions should be required to justify why they continue occupying rented premises year after year without developing permanent alternatives.

They say a national office infrastructure strategy could significantly reduce recurrent expenditure. According to governance campaigners, billions currently spent on rent could instead finance new district hospitals, teachers’ housing, health centres and road maintenance projects.

DEFENDERS OF SUDHIR FIGHT BACK

However, not everyone believes the businessman deserves criticism. Many argue that the issue lies with government planning rather than the landlord. Business commentator Ben Ssebuguzi defended the property mogul. “This is a petty talk given how far Dr. Sudhir has brought our real estate sector,” he argued.

Others point out that constructing and maintaining commercial buildings requires huge investments, loans, taxes and operational costs. Humphrey Mutaasa noted that a single eight-storey commercial building can cost between Shs20 billion and Shs30 billion to construct before maintenance and taxes are even considered.

Another commentator, Sankara Aldertons, argued that the businessman merely identified a market opportunity.”Is it his fault that government failed to build offices and they want to rent in his beautiful expensive buildings?” he asked. Supporters say that if government agencies occupy his properties, it is likely because they provide suitable office space and meet procurement requirements.

INSIDE THE BUILDINGS DRAINING BILLIONS FROM TAXPAYERS

A closer look at the properties at the centre of the debate reveals that some of Kampala’s most prominent government offices operate from buildings associated with businessman Sudhir Ruparelia and companies linked to the Ruparelia Group.Among the most notable is Kingdom Kampala, the iconic commercial complex along Nile Avenue which hosts several government offices, including the Ministry of East African Affairs, the Equal Opportunities Commission and offices used by presidential advisors.

Another property frequently mentioned is Pearl of Africa Business Park on Yusuf Lule Road, where several government agencies have occupied office space over the years. The complex is widely associated with the Ruparelia property portfolio and has become one of the most visible symbols of government’s dependence on rented office accommodation.

The Ministry of Justice and Constitutional Affairs is among institutions reported to occupy rented premises linked to the businessman, while the Ministry of ICT and National Guidance has also previously operated from privately rented office space. In fact sources have intimated to us that the Ministry of Justice and Constitutional Affairs are about to wholly transfer to their new home in Naguru. This will mark the end of renting and thereby save the taxpayer the burden of rent.

The debate also extends to Simbamanyo House, where government departments have reportedly occupied office space. The building became the subject of public attention following its ownership disputes and subsequent acquisition by interests linked to the Ruparelia business empire.Parliament itself has become part of the discussion because of the rent reportedly paid for additional office space used by legislators and parliamentary departments outside the main parliamentary chambers.

Warehousing arrangements have also attracted scrutiny, with figures cited by Ssemujju alleging that both the Uganda Revenue Authority and the Electoral Commission pay hundreds of millions of shillings annually for storage facilities in Kampala and Ntinda.Critics argue that while these buildings are modern, strategically located and professionally managed, government’s continued reliance on rented facilities raises uncomfortable questions about long-term planning. “If government is spending nearly Shs35 billion every year on rent, how many permanent office blocks could have been built over the last ten years?” one governance activist asked.

The comparison with the Uganda People’s Defence Forces, which is increasingly investing in permanent infrastructure and headquarters, has only intensified public calls for a national strategy aimed at reducing dependence on private landlords.

THE BIG QUESTION

Yet despite the arguments, one question continues to dominate public discussion. Why does government continue paying billions in rent year after year while owning land across the country and possessing the ability to construct permanent office complexes?For many taxpayers, the answer may determine whether future generations continue funding private landlords or whether public money is redirected toward schools, hospitals, better salaries for doctors and teachers, and improved service delivery.

As the UPDF moves toward owning more of its infrastructure and reducing long-term rental obligations, pressure is mounting on civilian ministries to explain why they remain tenants.Until that question is answered, the debate over Uganda’s multibillion-shilling rent bill—and the fortunes earned from it—is unlikely to disappear anytime soon.

What begins as a seemingly harmless comment about Nameere’s disputed election victory quickly turns into a no-holds-barred exchange of accusations, threats of court action and personal attacks. The public showdown unfolds on X, formerly Twitter, where thousands of Ugandans watch in disbelief as two prominent women engage in a war of words that many describe as embarrassing, shocking and entertaining in equal measure.

THE POST THAT STARTS IT ALL

The drama starts when Nsibirwa who prefers to be called the hot CEO chick in town questions the circumstances under which Nameere becomes Woman MP for Masaka City. “How do you explain the MP election debacle? The law was broken to declare you winner,” Nsibirwa posts. The comment immediately ignites debate, with some social media users backing the media executive while others accuse her of targeting the newly appointed minister.

One user, Justice Hunter, dismisses the criticism and writes: “Which law hasn’t been broken in Uganda? Let Justine Nameere lead. The Constitution of Uganda was shredded long time.” Another user, Pharidah, warns Nsibirwa that she may have opened a dangerous battlefront. “She will go off on you… be prepared.”

NAMEERE DROPS A BOMB

Instead of responding directly to the election question, Nameere launches a blistering personal attack against the NMG boss.

“Nsibirwa, I stood surety for you in 2015. Your fellow managers at Vision Group refused to help you out of Police because you had become a recidivist due to your known alcohol and njaga (marijuana) problem!” Nameere writes. She then asks: “So when the law gives you bond it’s right but when it saves my cheated victory, then the law is bent?” The allegations spread like wildfire across social media, triggering fierce reactions from both supporters and critics. Nameere continues her offensive. “I hate to remind people when I help them especially omukazi omukulu. But the jealousy and hypocrisy of some people is going to force us to expose them. When I was declared MP she congratulated me. When I became a Minister she suddenly has a problem with my MP victory. Naye kiki?”

NSIBIRWA LAWYERS UP

The accusations immediately provoke a furious response from Nsibirwa. “Lies lies and more lies… because that’s who you are. And this can definitely land you in court for defamation. Let’s go!!” The legal threat only adds fuel to the raging online battle. Nsibirwa later doubles down.

“Keep building the case file. I am here for it… as are my lawyers.” As the exchange intensifies, social media users begin debating whether the fight will end in court.

SHEILAH GASHUMBA JOINS THE FIGHT

Media personality Sheilah Gashumba appears to side with Nameere. “Hehe Justine Nameere just put the woman in her place real quick.” Gashumba also questions why Nsibirwa publicly challenged a minister.

“For your information, this is a minister whether you agree to it or not. She might not be your favorite but that’s it. If she has done something wrong, DM her not on her page. Grow up.” Her comments spark another wave of reactions online.

KABUSHENGA RUSHES TO DEFEND HIS SUE

Former Vision Group CEO Robert Kabushenga publicly comes to Nsibirwa’s defence and delivers what many users describe as a powerful rebuttal. “I worked with Susan Nsibirwa between 2011 and 2019 as her supervisor when she headed our marketing function. Not once was she ever apprehended as a suspect in or charged with a criminal offense.”

Kabushenga further praises her integrity. “In fact, she left two years before me with her record of high integrity and stellar performance.”

He adds that any such allegations would have surfaced years ago if they were true. “I am certain that her current employer would have done due diligence before entrusting her with her present role.” For starters Kabushenga and Nsibirwa are the architects of the most successfully project at Vision Group dubbed ‘Harvest Money Expo’.

LAWYERS AND ACTIVISTS WEIGH IN

Prominent lawyer Nicholas Opiyo joins the debate. “Is there a bail bond form she can share? Or is it a political bluff calculated to besmirch the good name of Sue Nsibirwa?”

Veteran politician Wafula Oguttu also weighs in. “From the little she has so far displayed in the media about herself in the past six months, she lacks credibility to be believed.”

Author and activist Kakwenza Rukirabashaija warns Nameere about possible legal consequences. “Slow down. Your godfathers might protect your political interests, but don’t think they will protect you against a civil suit.”

‘WHAT ARE YOUNG GIRLS LEARNING?’

Arnold Ankunda expresses disappointment with the public spectacle. “You women, do you even realize that somewhere in Teso, Yumbe, Mukono, Ntungamo and many other places, young girls are looking up to you? What exactly are they supposed to learn from you?”

His comments resonate with many Ugandans who believe public leaders should set a better example.

SOCIAL MEDIA TURNS THE FIGHT INTO ENTERTAINMENT

Not everyone sees the exchange as a serious matter. Pastor Martin Ssempa jokes: “This catfight violence is exactly why I pay Elon to be on X.”

Johnnie Musenze declares: “Gabriel yagikubye bweru… gwawedde 3:1 in favor of Nameere.”

Others strongly disagree. Mak Eyee writes: “Susan Nsibirwa and Justine Nameere’s battle is the most unbalanced I have ever seen. It’s like a rat biting an elephant and calling itself a hero.”

NINYE TABZ ENTERS THE WAR

Just when many thought the online battle could not get any hotter, social media commentator Ninye Tabz jumps into the fray and publicly demands that Nameere apologize to Nsibirwa.

“Nameere should apologize to Nsibirwa immediately, less of which, I’ll go rogue too and present some receipts of our beloved minister doing un-ministerial things.” The statement immediately catches Nameere’s attention and triggers another fiery exchange. In a lengthy response, the minister accuses Ninye Tabz of blackmail and intimidation.

“Nameere making those false allegations against Madam Sue will be the last time she does anything like that! I am going to teach you about a law called threatening violence! You have 30 minutes to delete these threats or face the real law!”

She continues: “You have struggled so bad to blackmail me and get my attention! I ignored you but still you won’t respect my silence because it is a completely different language that people like you understand!” Nameere insists that social media users are increasingly supporting her position. “Ugandans are slowly realizing that social media bullies like you don’t respect silence, that is why they are taking my side in as much as you are shouting indiscipline! Indiscipline!”

The minister also questions why Ninye Tabz is demanding an apology if Nsibirwa intends to pursue legal action. “Why are you soliciting for an apology if Nsibirwa is going to court?” She then broadens her attack, accusing the media executive of taking political positions while heading a major media organization. “Tell your mother or mentor or wife or hirer or whatever Nsibirwa is to you, to respect the media group she works for. She is always taking political sides, attacking NRM leaders, expecting what? What is her end in mind?” Nameere concludes with a warning.

“Lastly I know you are a mouth for hire but threatening me is a very bad idea! Very bad idea!” The exchange quickly becomes one of the most discussed threads on Ugandan X, adding yet another layer of drama to the already explosive confrontation.

WHO WILL HAVE THE LAST WORD?

Communications professional Patrick Oyulu aka OPP says the argument should have focused on the original question. “Susan asked a question. Whether one agrees with her or not, questions deserve answers, not personal demolition exercises.” He argues that Ugandan politics often avoids difficult discussions.

“The difficult question may be about process, law, accountability or leadership. But because those discussions are uncomfortable, we search where the light is brightest: personal attacks, old grudges, character assassination and social media theatrics.”

For now, both women remain defiant. Nameere shows no signs of backing down while Nsibirwa insists her lawyers are ready.Whether the battle remains online or moves to the courtroom, one thing is certain: Uganda’s latest social media war has captured national attention and turned X into a battlefield where reputations, credibility and political influence are all on the line.

]]> https://theinvestigatornews.com/2026/06/pussy-fight-rocks-x-nameere-and-sue-trade-explosive-allegations-in-public-showdown-defamation-threats-old-scores-and-political-fireworks-rock-x-fiery-minister-accuses-media-boss-of-police-arrests/feed/ 0